Why does array[idx++]+="a" increase idx once in Java 8 but twice in Java 9 and 10?

Cover Image for Why does array[idx++]+="a" increase idx once in Java 8 but twice in Java 9 and 10?
Matheus Mello
Matheus Mello
published a few days ago. updated a few hours ago

Why does array[idx++]+="a" increase idx once in Java 8 but twice in Java 9 and 10?

šŸ” Have you ever come across code that works differently in different versions of Java? In this blog post, we'll explore the mysterious behavior of the += operator on arrays in Java 8, Java 9, and Java 10. We'll walk you through the unexpected results and provide an easy solution. So, let's dive in!

The Challenge

šŸ’” A fellow code golfer, Kevin Cruijssen, created a challenging piece of code that involves incrementing the index while concatenating a string. Here's the code:

import java.util.*;

public class Main {
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    int size = 3;
    String[] array = new String[size];
    Arrays.fill(array, "");
    for (int i = 0; i <= 100;) {
      array[i++ % size] += i + " ";
    }
    for (String element: array) {
      System.out.println(element);
    }
  }
}

šŸ‘‰ When running this code in Java 8, the output is as expected:

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 100 
2 5 8 11 14 17 20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98 101 
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99

šŸ‘‰ But when running the same code in Java 10, the output is quite puzzling:

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100

šŸ§ The numbering is entirely off in Java 10, while it works as expected in Java 8. So, what exactly is happening here? Is it a bug in Java 10?

Investigating the Issue

šŸ” To understand what's happening, let's take a closer look at the code. The line that requires our attention is:

array[i++ % size] += i + " ";

āš”ļø Here, the += operator is used to concatenate the string i + " " to the element at the index i++ % size in the array.

Understanding the Difference

šŸ”€ To understand the difference between Java 8 and Java 9/10, we need to know how the += operator behaves when used on arrays.

šŸš€ In Java 8, the += operator increments i only once, regardless of how many times it is used on the same line. So, in our example code, i is incremented just once, allowing us to get the expected output.

šŸš€ However, starting from Java 9, the behavior of the += operator on arrays changed. It now increments i multiple times if it is used on the same line. This change in behavior is the reason behind the unexpected results in Java 9 and 10.

Solutions to the Problem

šŸ’” Now, it's time to explore some solutions to the problem. Here are a couple of approaches you can follow:

Solution 1: Separate the Increment Operation

šŸ”ƒ Instead of using the += operator directly on the array element, you can separate the increment operation from the concatenation. Here's how the modified code looks:

for (int i = 0; i <= 100;) {
  int index = i++ % size;
  array[index] += i + " ";
}

šŸš€ By separating the increment operation, you ensure that i is incremented just once, resulting in the expected output in all versions of Java.

Solution 2: Use a Temporary Variable

šŸ“ Another approach is to use a temporary variable to store the updated value of i before concatenating it to the array element. Here's the modified code:

for (int i = 0; i <= 100;) {
  int index = i % size;
  array[index] += (i++) + " ";
}

šŸš€ By storing the updated value of i in a temporary variable, you avoid the multiple incrementations caused by the += operator. This solution also ensures the expected output across different versions of Java.

Wrapping Up

šŸŽ‰ We've explored the mysterious behavior of the += operator on arrays in Java 8, Java 9, and Java 10. We've seen that the change in behavior starting from Java 9 can lead to unexpected results when concatenating strings in a loop.

šŸ˜„ Now that you know the difference and have two easy solutions at your disposal, you can confidently write code that works consistently across different versions of Java.

šŸ‘‰ Have you ever encountered a similar issue with code behaving differently in different Java versions? Share your experience in the comments below!

šŸ“¢ And don't forget to share this blog post with your fellow Java developers to help them understand and overcome this tricky issue!

Happy coding! šŸ’»šŸš€


More Stories

Cover Image for How can I echo a newline in a batch file?

How can I echo a newline in a batch file?

updated a few hours ago
batch-filenewlinewindows

šŸ”„ šŸ’» šŸ†’ Title: "Getting a Fresh Start: How to Echo a Newline in a Batch File" Introduction: Hey there, tech enthusiasts! Have you ever found yourself in a sticky situation with your batch file output? We've got your back! In this exciting blog post, we

Matheus Mello
Matheus Mello
Cover Image for How do I run Redis on Windows?

How do I run Redis on Windows?

updated a few hours ago
rediswindows

# Running Redis on Windows: Easy Solutions for Redis Enthusiasts! šŸš€ Redis is a powerful and popular in-memory data structure store that offers blazing-fast performance and versatility. However, if you're a Windows user, you might have stumbled upon the c

Matheus Mello
Matheus Mello
Cover Image for Best way to strip punctuation from a string

Best way to strip punctuation from a string

updated a few hours ago
punctuationpythonstring

# The Art of Stripping Punctuation: Simplifying Your Strings šŸ’„āœ‚ļø Are you tired of dealing with pesky punctuation marks that cause chaos in your strings? Have no fear, for we have a solution that will strip those buggers away and leave your texts clean an

Matheus Mello
Matheus Mello
Cover Image for Purge or recreate a Ruby on Rails database

Purge or recreate a Ruby on Rails database

updated a few hours ago
rakeruby-on-railsruby-on-rails-3

# Purge or Recreate a Ruby on Rails Database: A Simple Guide šŸš€ So, you have a Ruby on Rails database that's full of data, and you're now considering deleting everything and starting from scratch. Should you purge the database or recreate it? šŸ¤” Well, my

Matheus Mello
Matheus Mello